% \iffalse meta-comment
%
%% File: l3fp-expo.dtx
%
% Copyright (C) 2011-2025 The LaTeX Project
%
% It may be distributed and/or modified under the conditions of the
% LaTeX Project Public License (LPPL), either version 1.3c of this
% license or (at your option) any later version.  The latest version
% of this license is in the file
%
%    https://www.latex-project.org/lppl.txt
%
% This file is part of the "l3kernel bundle" (The Work in LPPL)
% and all files in that bundle must be distributed together.
%
% -----------------------------------------------------------------------
%
% The development version of the bundle can be found at
%
%    https://github.com/latex3/latex3
%
% for those people who are interested.
%
%<*driver>
\documentclass[full,kernel]{l3doc}
\begin{document}
  \DocInput{\jobname.dtx}
\end{document}
%</driver>
% \fi
%
% \title{^^A
%   The \pkg{l3fp-expo} module\\
%   Floating point exponential-related functions^^A
% }
% \author{^^A
%  The \LaTeX{} Project\thanks
%    {^^A
%      E-mail:
%        \href{mailto:latex-team@latex-project.org}
%          {latex-team@latex-project.org}^^A
%    }^^A
% }
% \date{Released 2025-12-29}
%
% \maketitle
%
% \begin{documentation}
%
% \end{documentation}
%
% \begin{implementation}
%
% \section{\pkg{l3fp-expo} implementation}
%
%    \begin{macrocode}
%<*code>
%    \end{macrocode}
%
%    \begin{macrocode}
%<@@=fp>
%    \end{macrocode}
%
% \begin{macro}[EXP]
%   {
%     \@@_parse_word_exp:N   ,
%     \@@_parse_word_ln:N    ,
%     \@@_parse_word_fact:N,
%   }
%   Unary functions.
%    \begin{macrocode}
\cs_new:Npn \@@_parse_word_exp:N
  { \@@_parse_unary_function:NNN \@@_exp_o:w ? }
\cs_new:Npn \@@_parse_word_ln:N
  { \@@_parse_unary_function:NNN \@@_ln_o:w ? }
\cs_new:Npn \@@_parse_word_fact:N
  { \@@_parse_unary_function:NNN \@@_fact_o:w ? }
%    \end{macrocode}
% \end{macro}
%
% \subsection{Logarithm}
%
% \subsubsection{Work plan}
%
% As for many other functions, we filter out special cases in
% \cs{@@_ln_o:w}.  Then \cs{@@_ln_npos_o:w} receives a positive normal
% number, which we write in the form $a\cdot 10^{b}$ with $a\in[0.1,1)$.
%
% \emph{The rest of this section is actually not in sync with the code.
%   Or is the code not in sync with the section?  In the current code,
%   $c\in [1,10]$ is such that $0.7\leq ac < 1.4$.}
%
% We are given a positive normal number, of the form $a\cdot 10^{b}$
% with $a\in[0.1,1)$.  To compute its logarithm, we find a small integer
% $5\leq c < 50$ such that $0.91 \leq a c / 5 < 1.1$, and use the
% relation
% \begin{equation*}
%   \ln (a \cdot 10^b) = b \cdot \ln (10) - \ln (c/5) + \ln (ac/5).
% \end{equation*}
% The logarithms $\ln(10)$ and $\ln(c/5)$ are looked up in a table.  The
% last term is computed using the following Taylor series of $\ln$ near
% $1$:
% \begin{equation*}
%   \ln\left(\frac{ac}{5}\right)
%   = \ln\left(\frac{1+t}{1-t}\right)
%   = 2t\left(1 + t^2 \left(\frac{1}{3} + t^2 \left(\frac{1}{5}
%         + t^2 \left(\frac{1}{7} + t^2 \left( \frac{1}{9} + \cdots
%           \right)\right)\right)\right)\right)
% \end{equation*}
% where $t=1-10/(ac+5)$.  We can now see one reason for the choice of
% $ac\sim 5$: then $ac+5=10(1-\epsilon)$ with $-0.05<\epsilon\leq
% 0.045$, hence
% \begin{equation*}
%   t = \frac{\epsilon}{1-\epsilon}
%   = \epsilon (1+\epsilon)(1+\epsilon^2)(1+\epsilon^4)\ldots,
% \end{equation*}
% is not too difficult to compute.
%
% \subsubsection{Some constants}
%
% \begin{variable}
%   {
%     \c_@@_ln_i_fixed_tl ,
%     \c_@@_ln_ii_fixed_tl ,
%     \c_@@_ln_iii_fixed_tl ,
%     \c_@@_ln_iv_fixed_tl ,
%     \c_@@_ln_vi_fixed_tl ,
%     \c_@@_ln_vii_fixed_tl ,
%     \c_@@_ln_viii_fixed_tl ,
%     \c_@@_ln_ix_fixed_tl ,
%     \c_@@_ln_x_fixed_tl,
%   }
%   A few values of the logarithm as extended fixed point numbers.
%   Those are needed in the implementation.  It turns out that we don't
%   need the value of $\ln(5)$.
%    \begin{macrocode}
\tl_const:Nn \c_@@_ln_i_fixed_tl
  { {0000}{0000}{0000}{0000}{0000}{0000}\@@_sep:}
\tl_const:Nn \c_@@_ln_ii_fixed_tl
  { {6931}{4718}{0559}{9453}{0941}{7232}\@@_sep:}
\tl_const:Nn \c_@@_ln_iii_fixed_tl
  {{10986}{1228}{8668}{1096}{9139}{5245}\@@_sep:}
\tl_const:Nn \c_@@_ln_iv_fixed_tl
  {{13862}{9436}{1119}{8906}{1883}{4464}\@@_sep:}
\tl_const:Nn \c_@@_ln_vi_fixed_tl
  {{17917}{5946}{9228}{0550}{0081}{2477}\@@_sep:}
\tl_const:Nn \c_@@_ln_vii_fixed_tl
  {{19459}{1014}{9055}{3133}{0510}{5353}\@@_sep:}
\tl_const:Nn \c_@@_ln_viii_fixed_tl
  {{20794}{4154}{1679}{8359}{2825}{1696}\@@_sep:}
\tl_const:Nn \c_@@_ln_ix_fixed_tl
  {{21972}{2457}{7336}{2193}{8279}{0490}\@@_sep:}
\tl_const:Nn \c_@@_ln_x_fixed_tl
  {{23025}{8509}{2994}{0456}{8401}{7991}\@@_sep:}
%    \end{macrocode}
% \end{variable}
%
% \subsubsection{Sign, exponent, and special numbers}
%
% \begin{macro}[EXP]{\@@_ln_o:w}
%   The logarithm of negative numbers (including $-\infty$ and $-0$)
%   raises the \enquote{invalid} exception.  The logarithm of $+0$ is
%   $-\infty$, raising a division by zero exception.  The logarithm of
%   $+\infty$ or a \texttt{nan} is itself.  Positive normal numbers call
%   \cs{@@_ln_npos_o:w}.
%    \begin{macrocode}
\cs_new:Npn \@@_ln_o:w #1 \s_@@ \@@_chk:w #2#3#4\@@_sep: @
  {
    \if_meaning:w 2 #3
      \@@_case_use:nw { \@@_invalid_operation_o:nw { ln } }
    \fi:
    \if_case:w #2 \exp_stop_f:
      \@@_case_use:nw
        { \@@_division_by_zero_o:Nnw \c_minus_inf_fp { ln } }
    \or:
    \else:
      \@@_case_return_same_o:w
    \fi:
    \@@_ln_npos_o:w \s_@@ \@@_chk:w #2#3#4\@@_sep:
  }
%    \end{macrocode}
% \end{macro}
%
% \subsubsection{Absolute ln}
%
% \begin{macro}[EXP]{\@@_ln_npos_o:w}
%   We catch the case of a significand very close to $0.1$ or to $1$.
%   In all other cases, the final result is at least $10^{-4}$, and
%   then an error of $0.5\cdot 10^{-20}$ is acceptable.
%    \begin{macrocode}
\cs_new:Npn \@@_ln_npos_o:w \s_@@ \@@_chk:w 10#1#2#3\@@_sep:
  { %^^A todo: ln(1) should be "exact zero", not "underflow"
    \exp_after:wN \@@_sanitize:Nw
    \int_value:w % for the overall sign
      \if_int_compare:w #1 < \c_one_int
        2
      \else:
        0
      \fi:
      \exp_after:wN \exp_stop_f:
      \int_value:w \@@_int_eval:w % for the exponent
        \@@_ln_significand:NNNNnnnN #2#3
        \@@_ln_exponent:wn {#1}
  }
%    \end{macrocode}
% \end{macro}
%
% \begin{macro}[EXP]{\@@_ln_significand:NNNNnnnN}
%   \begin{syntax}
%     \cs{@@_ln_significand:NNNNnnnN} \meta{X_1} \Arg{X_2} \Arg{X_3} \Arg{X_4} \meta{continuation}
%   \end{syntax}
%   This function expands to
%   \begin{syntax}
%     \meta{continuation} \Arg{Y_1} \Arg{Y_2} \Arg{Y_3} \Arg{Y_4} \Arg{Y_5} \Arg{Y_6} \cs{@@_sep:}
%   \end{syntax}
%   where $Y = - \ln(X)$ as an extended fixed point.
%    \begin{macrocode}
\cs_new:Npn \@@_ln_significand:NNNNnnnN #1#2#3#4
  {
    \exp_after:wN \@@_ln_x_ii:wnnnn
    \int_value:w
      \if_case:w #1 \exp_stop_f:
      \or:
        \if_int_compare:w #2 < 4 \exp_stop_f:
          \@@_int_eval:w 10 - #2
        \else:
          6
        \fi:
      \or: 4
      \or: 3
      \or: 2
      \or: 2
      \or: 2
      \else: 1
      \fi:
    \@@_sep: { #1 #2 #3 #4 }
  }
%    \end{macrocode}
% \end{macro}
%
% \begin{macro}[EXP]{\@@_ln_x_ii:wnnnn}
%   We have thus found $c \in [1,10]$ such that $0.7\leq ac < 1.4$
%   in all cases. Compute $ 1 + x = 1 + ac \in [1.7,2.4)$.
%    \begin{macrocode}
\cs_new:Npn \@@_ln_x_ii:wnnnn #1\@@_sep: #2#3#4#5
  {
    \exp_after:wN \@@_ln_div_after:Nw
    \cs:w c_@@_ln_ \@@_int_to_roman:w #1 _fixed_tl \exp_after:wN \cs_end:
    \int_value:w
      \exp_after:wN \@@_ln_x_iv:wnnnnnnnn
      \int_value:w \@@_int_eval:w
        \exp_after:wN \@@_ln_x_iii_var:NNNNNw
        \int_value:w \@@_int_eval:w 9999 9990 + #1*#2#3 +
          \exp_after:wN \@@_ln_x_iii:NNNNNNw
          \int_value:w \@@_int_eval:w 10 0000 0000 + #1*#4#5 \@@_sep:
    {20000} {0000} {0000} {0000}
  } %^^A todo: reoptimize (a generalization attempt failed).
\cs_new:Npn \@@_ln_x_iii:NNNNNNw #1#2 #3#4#5#6 #7\@@_sep:
  { #1#2\@@_sep: {#3#4#5#6} {#7} }
\cs_new:Npn \@@_ln_x_iii_var:NNNNNw #1 #2#3#4#5 #6\@@_sep:
  {
    #1#2#3#4#5 + 1 \@@_sep:
    {#1#2#3#4#5} {#6}
  }
%    \end{macrocode}
%   The Taylor series to be used is expressed in terms of
%   $t = (x-1)/(x+1) = 1 - 2/(x+1)$. We now compute the
%   quotient with extended precision, reusing some code
%   from \cs{@@_/_o:ww}. Note that $1+x$ is known exactly.
%
%   To reuse notations from \pkg{l3fp-basics}, we want to
%   compute $ A / Z $ with $ A = 2 $ and $ Z = x + 1 $.
%   In \pkg{l3fp-basics}, we considered the case where
%   both $A$ and $Z$ are arbitrary, in the range $[0.1,1)$,
%   and we had to monitor the growth of the sequence of
%   remainders $A$, $B$, $C$, etc. to ensure that no overflow
%   occurred during the computation of the next quotient.
%   The main source of risk was our choice to define the
%   quotient as roughly $10^9 \cdot A / 10^5 \cdot Z$: then
%   $A$ was bound to be below $2.147\cdots$, and this limit
%   was never far.
%
%   In our case, we can simply work with $10^8 \cdot A$ and
%   $10^4 \cdot Z$, because our reason to work with higher
%   powers has gone: we needed the integer $y \simeq 10^5 \cdot Z$
%   to be at least $10^4$, and now, the definition
%   $y \simeq 10^4 \cdot Z$ suffices.
%
%   Let us thus define $y = \left\lfloor 10^4 \cdot Z \right\rfloor + 1
%   \in ( 1.7 \cdot 10^4, 2.4 \cdot 10^4 ] $, and
%   \[
%   Q_{1}
%   =
%   \left\lfloor
%     \frac {\left\lfloor 10^8 \cdot A\right\rfloor} {y} - \frac{1}{2}
%   \right\rfloor.
%   \]
%   (The $1/2$ comes from how \eTeX{} rounds.) As for division, it is
%   easy to see that $Q_{1} \leq 10^4 A / Z$, i.e., $Q_{1}$
%   is an underestimate.
%
%   Exactly as we did for division, we set $B = 10^4 A - Q_{1}Z$. Then
%   \begin{align*}
%     10^4 B
%     & \leq
%     A_{1}A_{2}.A_{3}A_{4}
%     - \left( \frac{A_{1}A_{2}}{y} - \frac{3}{2} \right) 10^4 Z
%     \\
%     & \leq
%     A_{1}A_{2} \left( 1 - \frac{10^4 Z}{y} \right) + 1 + \frac{3}{2} y
%     \\
%     & \leq
%     10^8 \frac{A}{y} + 1 + \frac{3}{2} y
%   \end{align*}
%   In the same way, and using $1.7\cdot 10^4\leq y\leq 2.4\cdot 10^4$,
%   and convexity, we get
%   \begin{align*}
%     10^4 A &= 2\cdot 10^4 \\
%     10^4 B &\leq 10^8 \frac{A}{y} + 1.6 y \leq 4.7\cdot 10^4\\
%     10^4 C &\leq 10^8 \frac{B}{y} + 1.6 y \leq 5.8\cdot 10^4\\
%     10^4 D &\leq 10^8 \frac{C}{y} + 1.6 y \leq 6.3\cdot 10^4\\
%     10^4 E &\leq 10^8 \frac{D}{y} + 1.6 y \leq 6.5\cdot 10^4\\
%     10^4 F &\leq 10^8 \frac{E}{y} + 1.6 y \leq 6.6\cdot 10^4\\
%   \end{align*}
%   Note that we compute more steps than for division: since $t$ is
%   not the end result, we need to know it with more accuracy
%   (on the other hand, the ending is much simpler, as we don't
%   need an exact rounding for transcendental functions, but just
%   a faithful rounding).
%   ^^A todo: doc
%
%   \begin{syntax}
%     \cs{@@_ln_x_iv:wnnnnnnnn} \meta{1 or 2} \meta{8d} \cs{@@_sep:} \Arg{4d} \Arg{4d} \meta{fixed-tl}
%   \end{syntax}
%   The number is $x$. Compute $y$ by adding 1 to the five first digits.
%    \begin{macrocode}
\cs_new:Npn \@@_ln_x_iv:wnnnnnnnn #1\@@_sep: #2#3#4#5 #6#7#8#9
  {
    \exp_after:wN \@@_div_significand_pack:NNN
    \int_value:w \@@_int_eval:w
    \@@_ln_div_i:w #1 \@@_sep:
      #6 #7 \@@_sep: {#8} {#9}
      {#2} {#3} {#4} {#5}
      { \exp_after:wN \@@_ln_div_ii:wwn \int_value:w #1 }
      { \exp_after:wN \@@_ln_div_ii:wwn \int_value:w #1 }
      { \exp_after:wN \@@_ln_div_ii:wwn \int_value:w #1 }
      { \exp_after:wN \@@_ln_div_ii:wwn \int_value:w #1 }
      { \exp_after:wN \@@_ln_div_vi:wwn \int_value:w #1 }
  }
\cs_new:Npn \@@_ln_div_i:w #1\@@_sep:
  {
    \exp_after:wN \@@_div_significand_calc:wwnnnnnnn
    \int_value:w \@@_int_eval:w 999999 + 2 0000 0000 / #1 \@@_sep: % Q1
  }
\cs_new:Npn \@@_ln_div_ii:wwn
    #1\@@_sep: #2\@@_sep:#3 % y\@@_sep: B1\@@_sep:B2 <- for k=1
  {
    \exp_after:wN \@@_div_significand_pack:NNN
    \int_value:w \@@_int_eval:w
      \exp_after:wN \@@_div_significand_calc:wwnnnnnnn
      \int_value:w \@@_int_eval:w 999999 + #2 #3 / #1 \@@_sep: % Q2
      #2 #3 \@@_sep:
  }
\cs_new:Npn \@@_ln_div_vi:wwn
    #1\@@_sep: #2\@@_sep:#3#4#5 #6#7#8#9 %y\@@_sep:F1\@@_sep:F2F3F4x1x2x3x4
  {
    \exp_after:wN \@@_div_significand_pack:NNN
    \int_value:w \@@_int_eval:w 1000000 + #2 #3 / #1 \@@_sep: % Q6
  }
%    \end{macrocode}
%   We now have essentially
%   ^^A todo: determine error on $Q_{6}$ (probably $6.7$),
%   ^^A todo: conclude the final result is off by $<10^{-23}$
%   \begin{syntax}
%     \cs{@@_ln_div_after:Nw} \meta{fixed tl}
%     \cs{@@_div_significand_pack:NNN} $10^6 + Q_{1}$
%     \cs{@@_div_significand_pack:NNN} $10^6 + Q_{2}$
%     \cs{@@_div_significand_pack:NNN} $10^6 + Q_{3}$
%     \cs{@@_div_significand_pack:NNN} $10^6 + Q_{4}$
%     \cs{@@_div_significand_pack:NNN} $10^6 + Q_{5}$
%     \cs{@@_div_significand_pack:NNN} $10^6 + Q_{6}$ \cs{@@_sep:}
%     \meta{exponent} \cs{@@_sep:} \meta{continuation}
%   \end{syntax}
%   where \meta{fixed tl} holds the logarithm of a number
%   in $[1,10]$, and \meta{exponent} is
%   the exponent. Also, the expansion is done backwards. Then
%   \cs{@@_div_significand_pack:NNN} puts things in the
%   correct order to add the $Q_{i}$ together and put \cs{@@_sep:}s
%   between each piece. Once those have been expanded, we get
%   \begin{syntax}
%     \cs{@@_ln_div_after:Nw} \meta{fixed-tl} \meta{1d} \cs{@@_sep:} \meta{4d} \cs{@@_sep:}
%     ~~\meta{4d} \cs{@@_sep:} \meta{4d} \cs{@@_sep:} \meta{4d} \cs{@@_sep:} \meta{4d} \cs{@@_sep:}
%     ~~\meta{4d} \cs{@@_sep:} \meta{exponent} \cs{@@_sep:}
%   \end{syntax}
%   ^^A todo: redoc.
%   Just as with division, we know that the first two digits
%   are |1| and |0| because of bounds on the final result of
%   the division $2/(x+1)$, which is between roughly $0.8$ and $1.2$.
%   We then compute $1-2/(x+1)$, after testing whether $2/(x+1)$ is
%   greater than or smaller than $1$.
%    \begin{macrocode}
\cs_new:Npn \@@_ln_div_after:Nw #1#2\@@_sep:
  {
    \if_meaning:w 0 #2
      \exp_after:wN \@@_ln_t_small:Nw
    \else:
      \exp_after:wN \@@_ln_t_large:NNw
      \exp_after:wN -
    \fi:
    #1
  }
\cs_new:Npn \@@_ln_t_small:Nw
    #1 #2\@@_sep: #3\@@_sep: #4\@@_sep: #5\@@_sep: #6\@@_sep: #7\@@_sep:
  {
    \exp_after:wN \@@_ln_t_large:NNw
    \exp_after:wN + % <sign>
    \exp_after:wN #1
    \int_value:w \@@_int_eval:w 9999 - #2 \exp_after:wN \@@_sep:
    \int_value:w \@@_int_eval:w 9999 - #3 \exp_after:wN \@@_sep:
    \int_value:w \@@_int_eval:w 9999 - #4 \exp_after:wN \@@_sep:
    \int_value:w \@@_int_eval:w 9999 - #5 \exp_after:wN \@@_sep:
    \int_value:w \@@_int_eval:w 9999 - #6 \exp_after:wN \@@_sep:
    \int_value:w \@@_int_eval:w 1 0000 - #7 \@@_sep:
  }
%    \end{macrocode}
%
%   \begin{syntax}
%     \cs{@@_ln_t_large:NNw} \meta{sign} \meta{fixed tl}
%     ~~\meta{t_1}\cs{@@_sep:} \meta{t_2} \cs{@@_sep:} \meta{t_3}\cs{@@_sep:} \meta{t_4}
%     ~~\cs{@@_sep:} \meta{t_5} \cs{@@_sep:} \meta{t_6}\cs{@@_sep:}
%     ~~\meta{exponent} \cs{@@_sep:} \meta{continuation}
%   \end{syntax}
%   Compute the square $|t|^2$, and keep $|t|$ at the end with its
%   sign. We know that $|t|<0.1765$, so every piece has at most $4$
%   digits. However, since we were not careful in \cs{@@_ln_t_small:w},
%   they can have less than $4$ digits.
%    \begin{macrocode}
\cs_new:Npn \@@_ln_t_large:NNw
    #1 #2
    #3\@@_sep: #4\@@_sep: #5\@@_sep: #6\@@_sep: #7\@@_sep: #8\@@_sep:
  {
    \exp_after:wN \@@_ln_square_t_after:w
    \int_value:w \@@_int_eval:w 9999 0000 + #3*#3
      \exp_after:wN \@@_ln_square_t_pack:NNNNNw
      \int_value:w \@@_int_eval:w 9999 0000 + 2*#3*#4
        \exp_after:wN \@@_ln_square_t_pack:NNNNNw
        \int_value:w \@@_int_eval:w 9999 0000 + 2*#3*#5 + #4*#4
          \exp_after:wN \@@_ln_square_t_pack:NNNNNw
          \int_value:w \@@_int_eval:w 9999 0000 + 2*#3*#6 + 2*#4*#5
            \exp_after:wN \@@_ln_square_t_pack:NNNNNw
            \int_value:w \@@_int_eval:w
              1 0000 0000 + 2*#3*#7 + 2*#4*#6 + #5*#5
              + (2*#3*#8 + 2*#4*#7 + 2*#5*#6) / 1 0000
              % \@@_sep: \@@_sep: \@@_sep:
    \exp_after:wN \@@_ln_twice_t_after:w
    \int_value:w \@@_int_eval:w -1 + 2*#3
      \exp_after:wN \@@_ln_twice_t_pack:Nw
      \int_value:w \@@_int_eval:w 9999 + 2*#4
        \exp_after:wN \@@_ln_twice_t_pack:Nw
        \int_value:w \@@_int_eval:w 9999 + 2*#5
          \exp_after:wN \@@_ln_twice_t_pack:Nw
          \int_value:w \@@_int_eval:w 9999 + 2*#6
            \exp_after:wN \@@_ln_twice_t_pack:Nw
            \int_value:w \@@_int_eval:w 9999 + 2*#7
              \exp_after:wN \@@_ln_twice_t_pack:Nw
              \int_value:w \@@_int_eval:w 10000 + 2*#8 \@@_sep: \@@_sep:
    { \@@_ln_c:NwNw #1 }
    #2
  }
\cs_new:Npn \@@_ln_twice_t_pack:Nw #1 #2\@@_sep: { + #1 \@@_sep: {#2} }
\cs_new:Npn \@@_ln_twice_t_after:w #1\@@_sep:
  { \@@_sep:\@@_sep:\@@_sep: {#1} }
\cs_new:Npn \@@_ln_square_t_pack:NNNNNw #1 #2#3#4#5 #6\@@_sep:
  { + #1#2#3#4#5 \@@_sep: {#6} }
\cs_new:Npn \@@_ln_square_t_after:w 1 0 #1#2#3 #4\@@_sep:
  { \@@_ln_Taylor:wwNw {0#1#2#3} {#4} }
%    \end{macrocode}
% \end{macro}
%
% \begin{macro}{\@@_ln_Taylor:wwNw}
%   Denoting $T=t^2$, we get
%   \begin{syntax}
%     \cs{@@_ln_Taylor:wwNw}
%     ~~\Arg{T_1} \Arg{T_2} \Arg{T_3} \Arg{T_4} \Arg{T_5} \Arg{T_6} \cs{@@_sep:} \cs{@@_sep:}
%     ~~\Arg{(2t)_1} \Arg{(2t)_2} \Arg{(2t)_3} \Arg{(2t)_4} \Arg{(2t)_5} \Arg{(2t)_6} \cs{@@_sep:}
%     ~~|{| \cs{@@_ln_c:NwNw} \meta{sign} |}|
%     ~~\meta{fixed tl} \meta{exponent} \cs{@@_sep:} \meta{continuation}
%   \end{syntax}
%   And we want to compute
%   \[
%   \ln\left(\frac{1+t}{1-t}\right)
%   = 2t\left(1 + T \left(\frac{1}{3} + T \left(\frac{1}{5}
%         + T \left(\frac{1}{7} + T \left( \frac{1}{9} + \cdots
%           \right)\right)\right)\right)\right)
%   \]
%   The process looks as follows (\cs{@@_sep:} represented by |;|)
%   \begin{verbatim}
%     \loop 5; A;
%     \div_int 5; 1.0; \add A; \mul T; {\loop \eval 5-2;}
%     \add 0.2; A; \mul T; {\loop \eval 5-2;}
%     \mul B; T; {\loop 3;}
%     \loop 3; C;
%   \end{verbatim}
%   ^^A todo: doc
%
%   This uses the routine for dividing a number by a small integer
%   (${}<10^4$).
%    \begin{macrocode}
\cs_new:Npn \@@_ln_Taylor:wwNw
  {
    \@@_ln_Taylor_loop:www
      21 \@@_sep: {0000}{0000}{0000}{0000}{0000}{0000} \@@_sep:
  }
\cs_new:Npn \@@_ln_Taylor_loop:www #1\@@_sep: #2\@@_sep: #3\@@_sep:
  {
    \if_int_compare:w #1 = \c_one_int
      \@@_ln_Taylor_break:w
    \fi:
    \exp_after:wN \@@_fixed_div_int:wwN \c_@@_one_fixed_tl #1\@@_sep:
    \@@_fixed_add:wwn #2\@@_sep:
    \@@_fixed_mul:wwn #3\@@_sep:
    {
      \exp_after:wN \@@_ln_Taylor_loop:www
      \int_value:w \@@_int_eval:w #1 - 2 \@@_sep:
    }
    #3\@@_sep:
  }
\cs_new:Npn \@@_ln_Taylor_break:w
    \fi: #1 \@@_fixed_add:wwn #2#3\@@_sep: #4 \@@_sep:\@@_sep:
  {
    \fi:
    \exp_after:wN \@@_fixed_mul:wwn
    \exp_after:wN { \int_value:w \@@_int_eval:w 10000 + #2 } #3\@@_sep:
  }
%    \end{macrocode}
% \end{macro}
%
% \begin{macro}{\@@_ln_c:NwNw}
%   \begin{syntax}
%     \cs{@@_ln_c:NwNw} \meta{sign}
%     ~~\Arg{r_1} \Arg{r_2} \Arg{r_3} \Arg{r_4} \Arg{r_5} \Arg{r_6} \cs{@@_sep:}
%     ~~\meta{fixed tl} \meta{exponent} \cs{@@_sep:} \meta{continuation}
%   \end{syntax}
%   We are now reduced to finding $\ln(c)$ and $\meta{exponent}\ln(10)$
%   in a table, and adding it to the mixture. The first step is to
%   get $\ln(c) - \ln(x) = - \ln(a)$, then we get $|b|\ln(10)$ and add
%   or subtract.
%
%   For now, $\ln(x)$ is given as $\cdot 10^0$. Unless both the exponent
%   is $1$ and $c=1$, we shift to working in units of $\cdot 10^4$,
%   since the final result is at least $\ln(10/7) \simeq 0.35$.
%    \begin{macrocode}
\cs_new:Npn \@@_ln_c:NwNw #1 #2\@@_sep: #3
  {
    \if_meaning:w + #1
      \exp_after:wN \exp_after:wN \exp_after:wN \@@_fixed_sub:wwn
    \else:
      \exp_after:wN \exp_after:wN \exp_after:wN \@@_fixed_add:wwn
    \fi:
    #3 #2 \@@_sep:
  }
%    \end{macrocode}
% \end{macro}
%
% \begin{macro}{\@@_ln_exponent:wn}
%   \begin{syntax}
%     \cs{@@_ln_exponent:wn}
%     ~~\Arg{s_1} \Arg{s_2} \Arg{s_3} \Arg{s_4} \Arg{s_5} \Arg{s_6} \cs{@@_sep:}
%     ~~\Arg{exponent}
%   \end{syntax}
%   Compute \meta{exponent} times $\ln(10)$. Apart from the cases where
%   \meta{exponent} is $0$ or $1$, the result is necessarily at
%   least $\ln(10) \simeq 2.3$ in magnitude. We can thus drop the least
%   significant $4$ digits. In the case of a very large (positive or
%   negative) exponent, we can (and we need to) drop $4$ additional
%   digits, since the result is of order $10^4$. Naively, one would
%   think that in both cases we can drop $4$ more digits than we do,
%   but that would be slightly too tight for rounding to happen correctly.
%   Besides, we already have addition and subtraction for $24$ digits
%   fixed point numbers.
%    \begin{macrocode}
\cs_new:Npn \@@_ln_exponent:wn #1\@@_sep: #2
  {
    \if_case:w #2 \exp_stop_f:
      0 \@@_case_return:nw { \@@_fixed_to_float_o:Nw 2 }
    \or:
      \exp_after:wN \@@_ln_exponent_one:ww \int_value:w
    \else:
      \if_int_compare:w #2 > \c_zero_int
        \exp_after:wN \@@_ln_exponent_small:NNww
        \exp_after:wN 0
        \exp_after:wN \@@_fixed_sub:wwn \int_value:w
      \else:
        \exp_after:wN \@@_ln_exponent_small:NNww
        \exp_after:wN 2
        \exp_after:wN \@@_fixed_add:wwn \int_value:w -
      \fi:
    \fi:
    #2\@@_sep: #1\@@_sep:
  }
%    \end{macrocode}
%   Now we painfully write all the cases.\footnote{Bruno: do rounding.}
%   No overflow nor underflow can happen, except when computing \texttt{ln(1)}.
%    \begin{macrocode}
\cs_new:Npn \@@_ln_exponent_one:ww 1\@@_sep: #1\@@_sep:
  {
    0
    \exp_after:wN \@@_fixed_sub:wwn \c_@@_ln_x_fixed_tl #1\@@_sep:
    \@@_fixed_to_float_o:wN 0
  }
%    \end{macrocode}
%   For small exponents, we just drop one block of digits, and set the
%   exponent of the log to $4$ (minus any shift coming from leading zeros
%   in the conversion from fixed point to floating point). Note that here
%   the exponent has been made positive.
%    \begin{macrocode}
\cs_new:Npn \@@_ln_exponent_small:NNww #1#2#3\@@_sep: #4#5#6#7#8#9\@@_sep:
  {
    4
    \exp_after:wN \@@_fixed_mul:wwn
      \c_@@_ln_x_fixed_tl
      {#3}{0000}{0000}{0000}{0000}{0000} \@@_sep:
    #2
      {0000}{#4}{#5}{#6}{#7}{#8}\@@_sep:
    \@@_fixed_to_float_o:wN #1
  }
%    \end{macrocode}
% \end{macro}
%
% \subsection{Exponential}
%
% \subsubsection{Sign, exponent, and special numbers}
%
% \begin{macro}[EXP]{\@@_exp_o:w}
%    \begin{macrocode}
\cs_new:Npn \@@_exp_o:w #1 \s_@@ \@@_chk:w #2#3#4\@@_sep: @
  {
    \if_case:w #2 \exp_stop_f:
      \@@_case_return_o:Nw \c_one_fp
    \or:
      \exp_after:wN \@@_exp_normal_o:w
    \or:
      \if_meaning:w 0 #3
        \exp_after:wN \@@_case_return_o:Nw
        \exp_after:wN \c_inf_fp
      \else:
        \exp_after:wN \@@_case_return_o:Nw
        \exp_after:wN \c_zero_fp
      \fi:
    \or:
      \@@_case_return_same_o:w
    \fi:
    \s_@@ \@@_chk:w #2#3#4\@@_sep:
  }
%    \end{macrocode}
% \end{macro}
%
% \begin{macro}[EXP]{\@@_exp_normal_o:w, \@@_exp_pos_o:Nnwnw, \@@_exp_overflow:NN}
%   \begin{macrocode}
\cs_new:Npn \@@_exp_normal_o:w \s_@@ \@@_chk:w 1#1
  {
    \if_meaning:w 0 #1
      \@@_exp_pos_o:NNwnw + \@@_fixed_to_float_o:wN
    \else:
      \@@_exp_pos_o:NNwnw - \@@_fixed_inv_to_float_o:wN
    \fi:
  }
\cs_new:Npn \@@_exp_pos_o:NNwnw #1#2#3 \fi: #4#5\@@_sep:
  {
    \fi:
    \if_int_compare:w #4 > \c_@@_max_exp_exponent_int
      \token_if_eq_charcode:NNTF + #1
        { \@@_exp_overflow:NN \@@_overflow:w \c_inf_fp }
        { \@@_exp_overflow:NN \@@_underflow:w \c_zero_fp }
      \exp:w
    \else:
      \exp_after:wN \@@_sanitize:Nw
      \exp_after:wN 0
      \int_value:w #1 \@@_int_eval:w
        \if_int_compare:w #4 < \c_zero_int
          \exp_after:wN \use_i:nn
        \else:
          \exp_after:wN \use_ii:nn
        \fi:
        {
          0
          \@@_decimate:nNnnnn { - #4 }
            \@@_exp_Taylor:Nnnwn
        }
        {
          \@@_decimate:nNnnnn { \c_@@_prec_int - #4 }
            \@@_exp_pos_large:NnnNwn
        }
        #5
        {#4}
        #1 #2 0
        \exp:w
    \fi:
    \exp_after:wN \exp_end:
  }
\cs_new:Npn \@@_exp_overflow:NN #1#2
  {
    \exp_after:wN \exp_after:wN
    \exp_after:wN #1
    \exp_after:wN #2
  }
%    \end{macrocode}
% \end{macro}
%
% \begin{macro}[EXP]{\@@_exp_Taylor:Nnnwn}
% \begin{macro}[EXP]{\@@_exp_Taylor_loop:www, \@@_exp_Taylor_break:Nww}
%   This function is called for numbers in the range $[10^{-9},
%   10^{-1})$.  We compute $10$ terms of the Taylor series.  The
%   first argument is irrelevant (rounding digit used by some other
%   functions).  The next three arguments, at least $16$ digits,
%   delimited by a \cs{@@_sep:}, form a fixed point number, so we pack it
%   in blocks of $4$ digits.
%    \begin{macrocode}
\cs_new:Npn \@@_exp_Taylor:Nnnwn #1#2#3 #4\@@_sep: #5 #6
  {
    #6
    \@@_pack_twice_four:wNNNNNNNN
    \@@_pack_twice_four:wNNNNNNNN
    \@@_pack_twice_four:wNNNNNNNN
    \@@_exp_Taylor_ii:ww
    \@@_sep: #2#3#4 0000 0000 \@@_sep:
  }
\cs_new:Npn \@@_exp_Taylor_ii:ww #1\@@_sep: #2\@@_sep:
  { \@@_exp_Taylor_loop:www 10 \@@_sep: #1 \@@_sep: #1 \@@_sep: \s_@@_stop }
\cs_new:Npn \@@_exp_Taylor_loop:www #1\@@_sep: #2\@@_sep: #3\@@_sep:
  {
    \if_int_compare:w #1 = \c_one_int
      \exp_after:wN \@@_exp_Taylor_break:Nww
    \fi:
    \@@_fixed_div_int:wwN #3 \@@_sep: #1 \@@_sep:
    \@@_fixed_add_one:wN
    \@@_fixed_mul:wwn #2 \@@_sep:
    {
      \exp_after:wN \@@_exp_Taylor_loop:www
      \int_value:w \@@_int_eval:w #1 - 1 \@@_sep:
      #2 \@@_sep:
    }
  }
\cs_new:Npn \@@_exp_Taylor_break:Nww #1 #2\@@_sep: #3 \s_@@_stop
  { \@@_fixed_add_one:wN #2 \@@_sep: }
%    \end{macrocode}
% \end{macro}
% \end{macro}
%
% \begin{variable}{\c_@@_exp_intarray}
%   The integer array has $6\times 9\times 4=216$ items encoding the
%   values of $\exp(j\times 10^i)$ for $j=1,\dots,9$ and $i=-1,\dots,4$.
%   Each value is expressed as $\simeq 10^p \times 0.m_1m_2m_3$ with
%   three $8$-digit blocks $m_1$, $m_2$, $m_3$ and an integer
%   exponent~$p$ (one more than the scientific exponent), and these are
%   stored in the integer array as four items: $p$, $10^8+m_1$,
%   $10^8+m_2$, $10^8+m_3$.  The various exponentials are stored in
%   increasing order of $j\times 10^i$.
%
%   Storing this data in an integer array makes it slightly harder to
%   access (slower, too), but uses $16$ bytes of memory per exponential
%   stored, while storing as tokens used around $40$ tokens; tokens have
%   an especially large footprint in Unicode-aware engines.
%    \begin{macrocode}
\intarray_const_from_clist:Nn \c_@@_exp_intarray
  {
         1 , 1 1105 1709 , 1 1807 5647 , 1 6248 1171 ,
         1 , 1 1221 4027 , 1 5816 0169 , 1 8339 2107 ,
         1 , 1 1349 8588 , 1 0757 6003 , 1 1039 8374 ,
         1 , 1 1491 8246 , 1 9764 1270 , 1 3178 2485 ,
         1 , 1 1648 7212 , 1 7070 0128 , 1 1468 4865 ,
         1 , 1 1822 1188 , 1 0039 0508 , 1 9748 7537 ,
         1 , 1 2013 7527 , 1 0747 0476 , 1 5216 2455 ,
         1 , 1 2225 5409 , 1 2849 2467 , 1 6045 7954 ,
         1 , 1 2459 6031 , 1 1115 6949 , 1 6638 0013 ,
         1 , 1 2718 2818 , 1 2845 9045 , 1 2353 6029 ,
         1 , 1 7389 0560 , 1 9893 0650 , 1 2272 3043 ,
         2 , 1 2008 5536 , 1 9231 8766 , 1 7740 9285 ,
         2 , 1 5459 8150 , 1 0331 4423 , 1 9078 1103 ,
         3 , 1 1484 1315 , 1 9102 5766 , 1 0342 1116 ,
         3 , 1 4034 2879 , 1 3492 7351 , 1 2260 8387 ,
         4 , 1 1096 6331 , 1 5842 8458 , 1 5992 6372 ,
         4 , 1 2980 9579 , 1 8704 1728 , 1 2747 4359 ,
         4 , 1 8103 0839 , 1 2757 5384 , 1 0077 1000 ,
         5 , 1 2202 6465 , 1 7948 0671 , 1 6516 9579 ,
         9 , 1 4851 6519 , 1 5409 7902 , 1 7796 9107 ,
        14 , 1 1068 6474 , 1 5815 2446 , 1 2146 9905 ,
        18 , 1 2353 8526 , 1 6837 0199 , 1 8540 7900 ,
        22 , 1 5184 7055 , 1 2858 7072 , 1 4640 8745 ,
        27 , 1 1142 0073 , 1 8981 5684 , 1 2836 6296 ,
        31 , 1 2515 4386 , 1 7091 9167 , 1 0062 6578 ,
        35 , 1 5540 6223 , 1 8439 3510 , 1 0525 7117 ,
        40 , 1 1220 4032 , 1 9431 7840 , 1 8020 0271 ,
        44 , 1 2688 1171 , 1 4181 6135 , 1 4484 1263 ,
        87 , 1 7225 9737 , 1 6812 5749 , 1 2581 7748 ,
       131 , 1 1942 4263 , 1 9524 1255 , 1 9365 8421 ,
       174 , 1 5221 4696 , 1 8976 4143 , 1 9505 8876 ,
       218 , 1 1403 5922 , 1 1785 2837 , 1 4107 3977 ,
       261 , 1 3773 0203 , 1 0092 9939 , 1 8234 0143 ,
       305 , 1 1014 2320 , 1 5473 5004 , 1 5094 5533 ,
       348 , 1 2726 3745 , 1 7211 2566 , 1 5673 6478 ,
       391 , 1 7328 8142 , 1 2230 7421 , 1 7051 8866 ,
       435 , 1 1970 0711 , 1 1401 7046 , 1 9938 8888 ,
       869 , 1 3881 1801 , 1 9428 4368 , 1 5764 8232 ,
      1303 , 1 7646 2009 , 1 8905 4704 , 1 8893 1073 ,
      1738 , 1 1506 3559 , 1 7005 0524 , 1 9009 7592 ,
      2172 , 1 2967 6283 , 1 8402 3667 , 1 0689 6630 ,
      2606 , 1 5846 4389 , 1 5650 2114 , 1 7278 5046 ,
      3041 , 1 1151 7900 , 1 5080 6878 , 1 2914 4154 ,
      3475 , 1 2269 1083 , 1 0850 6857 , 1 8724 4002 ,
      3909 , 1 4470 3047 , 1 3316 5442 , 1 6408 6591 ,
      4343 , 1 8806 8182 , 1 2566 2921 , 1 5872 6150 ,
      8686 , 1 7756 0047 , 1 2598 6861 , 1 0458 3204 ,
     13029 , 1 6830 5723 , 1 7791 4884 , 1 1932 7351 ,
     17372 , 1 6015 5609 , 1 3095 3052 , 1 3494 7574 ,
     21715 , 1 5297 7951 , 1 6443 0315 , 1 3251 3576 ,
     26058 , 1 4665 6719 , 1 0099 3379 , 1 5527 2929 ,
     30401 , 1 4108 9724 , 1 3326 3186 , 1 5271 5665 ,
     34744 , 1 3618 6973 , 1 3140 0875 , 1 3856 4102 ,
     39087 , 1 3186 9209 , 1 6113 3900 , 1 6705 9685 ,
  }
%    \end{macrocode}
% \end{variable}
%
% \begin{macro}[rEXP]
%   {
%     \@@_exp_pos_large:NnnNwn ,
%     \@@_exp_large_after:wwn ,
%     \@@_exp_large:NwN ,
%     \@@_exp_intarray:w ,
%     \@@_exp_intarray_aux:w ,
%   }
%   The first two arguments are irrelevant (a rounding digit, and a
%   brace group with $8$ zeros).  The third argument is the integer part
%   of our number, then we have the decimal part delimited by a
%   \cs{@@_sep:}, and finally the exponent, in the range $[0,5]$.  Remove
%   leading zeros from the integer part: putting |#4| in there too
%   ensures that an integer part of $0$ is also removed.  Then read
%   digits one by one, looking up $\exp(\meta{digit}\cdot
%   10^{\meta{exponent}})$ in a table, and multiplying that to the
%   current total.  The loop is done by \cs{@@_exp_large:NwN}, whose
%   |#1| is the \meta{exponent}, |#2| is the current mantissa, and |#3|
%   is the \meta{digit}.  At the end, \cs{@@_exp_large_after:wwn} moves
%   on to the Taylor series, eventually multiplied with the mantissa
%   that we have just computed.
%    \begin{macrocode}
\cs_new:Npn \@@_exp_pos_large:NnnNwn #1#2#3 #4#5\@@_sep: #6
  {
    \exp_after:wN \exp_after:wN \exp_after:wN \@@_exp_large:NwN
    \exp_after:wN \exp_after:wN \exp_after:wN #6
    \exp_after:wN \c_@@_one_fixed_tl
    \int_value:w #3 #4 \exp_stop_f:
    #5 00000 \@@_sep:
  }
\cs_new:Npn \@@_exp_large:NwN #1#2\@@_sep: #3
  {
    \if_case:w #3 ~
      \exp_after:wN \@@_fixed_continue:wn
    \else:
      \exp_after:wN \@@_exp_intarray:w
      \int_value:w \@@_int_eval:w 36 * #1 + 4 * #3 \exp_after:wN \@@_sep:
    \fi:
    #2\@@_sep:
    {
      \if_meaning:w 0 #1
        \exp_after:wN \@@_exp_large_after:wwn
      \else:
        \exp_after:wN \@@_exp_large:NwN
        \int_value:w \@@_int_eval:w #1 - 1 \exp_after:wN \scan_stop:
      \fi:
    }
  }
\cs_new:Npn \@@_exp_intarray:w #1 \@@_sep:
  {
    +
    \__kernel_intarray_item:Nn \c_@@_exp_intarray
      { \@@_int_eval:w #1 - 3 \scan_stop: }
    \exp_after:wN \use_i:nnn
    \exp_after:wN \@@_fixed_mul:wwn
    \int_value:w 0
    \exp_after:wN \@@_exp_intarray_aux:w
    \int_value:w \__kernel_intarray_item:Nn
                   \c_@@_exp_intarray { \@@_int_eval:w #1 - 2 }
    \exp_after:wN \@@_exp_intarray_aux:w
    \int_value:w \__kernel_intarray_item:Nn
                   \c_@@_exp_intarray { \@@_int_eval:w #1 - 1 }
    \exp_after:wN \@@_exp_intarray_aux:w
    \int_value:w \__kernel_intarray_item:Nn
                   \c_@@_exp_intarray {#1} \@@_sep: \@@_sep:
  }
\cs_new:Npn \@@_exp_intarray_aux:w 1 #1#2#3#4#5 \@@_sep:
  { \@@_sep: {#1#2#3#4} {#5} }
\cs_new:Npn \@@_exp_large_after:wwn #1\@@_sep: #2\@@_sep: #3
  {
    \@@_exp_Taylor:Nnnwn ? { } { } 0 #2\@@_sep: {} #3
    \@@_fixed_mul:wwn #1\@@_sep:
  }
%    \end{macrocode}
% \end{macro}
%
% \subsection{Power}
%
% Raising a number $a$ to a power $b$ leads to many distinct situations.
% \begin{center}\def\abs#1{\lvert #1\rvert}
%   \begin{tabular}{>{$}c<{$}|*8{>{$}l<{$}}}
%     a^b          &-\infty &(-\infty,-0)  &-\text{integer}     &\pm 0 &+\text{integer}   &(0,\infty)      &+\infty &\nan \\ \hline
%     +\infty      &+0      &\multicolumn{2}{c}{$+0$}           &+1    &\multicolumn{2}{c}{$+\infty$}      &+\infty &\nan \\
%     (1,\infty)   &+0      &\multicolumn{2}{c}{$+\abs{a}^{b}$} &+1    &\multicolumn{2}{c}{$+\abs{a}^{b}$} &+\infty &\nan \\
%     +1           &+1      &\multicolumn{2}{c}{$+1$}           &+1    &\multicolumn{2}{c}{$+1$}           &+1      &+1   \\
%     (0,1)        &+\infty &\multicolumn{2}{c}{$+\abs{a}^{b}$} &+1    &\multicolumn{2}{c}{$+\abs{a}^{b}$} &+0      &\nan \\
%     +0           &+\infty &\multicolumn{2}{c}{$+\infty$}      &+1    &\multicolumn{2}{c}{$+0$}           &+0      &\nan \\
%     -0           &+\infty &\nan          &(-1)^b\infty        &+1    &(-1)^b 0          &+0              &+0      &\nan \\
%     (-1,0)       &+\infty &\nan          &(-1)^b\abs{a}^{b}   &+1    &(-1)^b\abs{a}^{b} &\nan            &+0      &\nan \\
%     -1           &+1      &\nan          &(-1)^b              &+1    &(-1)^b            &\nan            &+1      &\nan \\
%     (-\infty,-1) &+0      &\nan          &(-1)^b\abs{a}^{b}   &+1    &(-1)^b\abs{a}^{b} &\nan            &+\infty &\nan \\
%     -\infty      &+0      &+0            &(-1)^b 0            &+1    &(-1)^b\infty      &\nan            &+\infty &\nan \\
%     \nan         &\nan    &\nan          &\nan                &+1    &\nan              &\nan            &\nan    &\nan \\
%   \end{tabular}
% \end{center}
% We distinguished in this table the cases of finite (positive or
% negative) integer exponents, as $(-1)^b$ is defined in that case.
% One peculiarity of this operation is that $\nan^0 = 1^\nan = 1$,
% because this relation is obeyed for any number, even $\pm\infty$.
%
% \begin{macro}[EXP]+\@@_^_o:ww+
%   We cram most of the tests into a single function to save csnames.
%   First treat the case $b=0$: $a^0=1$ for any $a$, even \texttt{nan}.
%   Then test the sign of $a$.
%   \begin{itemize}
%   \item If it is positive, and $a$ is a normal number, call
%     \cs{@@_pow_normal_o:ww} followed by the two \texttt{fp} $a$ and $b$.
%     For $a=+0$ or $+\inf$, call \cs{@@_pow_zero_or_inf:ww} instead, to
%     return either $+0$ or $+\infty$ as appropriate.
%   \item If $a$ is a \texttt{nan}, then skip to the next \cs{@@_sep:}
%     (which happens to be conveniently the end of $b$) and return
%     \texttt{nan}.
%   \item Finally, if $a$ is negative, compute $|a|^b$
%     (\cs{@@_pow_normal_o:ww} which ignores the sign of its first
%     operand), and keep an extra copy of $a$ and $b$ (the second brace
%     group, containing \{~$b$~$a$~\}, is inserted between $a$ and $b$).
%     Then do some tests to find the final sign of the result if it
%     exists.
%   \end{itemize}
%    \begin{macrocode}
\cs_new:cpn { @@_ \iow_char:N \^ _o:ww }
    \s_@@ \@@_chk:w #1#2#3\@@_sep: \s_@@ \@@_chk:w #4#5#6\@@_sep:
  {
    \if_meaning:w 0 #4
      \@@_case_return_o:Nw \c_one_fp
    \fi:
    \if_case:w #2 \exp_stop_f:
      \exp_after:wN \use_i:nn
    \or:
      \@@_case_return_o:Nw \c_nan_fp
    \else:
      \exp_after:wN \@@_pow_neg:www
      \exp:w \exp_end_continue_f:w \exp_after:wN \use:nn
    \fi:
    {
      \if_meaning:w 1 #1
        \exp_after:wN \@@_pow_normal_o:ww
      \else:
        \exp_after:wN \@@_pow_zero_or_inf:ww
      \fi:
      \s_@@ \@@_chk:w #1#2#3\@@_sep:
    }
    { \s_@@ \@@_chk:w #4#5#6\@@_sep: \s_@@ \@@_chk:w #1#2#3\@@_sep: }
    \s_@@ \@@_chk:w #4#5#6\@@_sep:
  }
%    \end{macrocode}
% \end{macro}
%
% \begin{macro}[EXP]{\@@_pow_zero_or_inf:ww}
%   Raising $-0$ or $-\infty$ to \texttt{nan} yields \texttt{nan}.  For
%   other powers, the result is $+0$ if $0$ is raised to a positive
%   power or $\infty$ to a negative power, and $+\infty$ otherwise.
%   Thus, if the type of $a$ and the sign of $b$ coincide, the result
%   is~$0$, since those conveniently take the same possible values, $0$
%   and~$2$.  Otherwise, either $a=\pm\infty$ and $b>0$ and the result
%   is $+\infty$, or $a=\pm 0$ with $b<0$ and we have a division by zero
%   unless $b=-\infty$.
%    \begin{macrocode}
\cs_new:Npn \@@_pow_zero_or_inf:ww
    \s_@@ \@@_chk:w #1#2\@@_sep: \s_@@ \@@_chk:w #3#4
  {
    \if_meaning:w 1 #4
      \@@_case_return_same_o:w
    \fi:
    \if_meaning:w #1 #4
      \@@_case_return_o:Nw \c_zero_fp
    \fi:
    \if_meaning:w 2 #1
      \@@_case_return_o:Nw \c_inf_fp
    \fi:
    \if_meaning:w 2 #3
      \@@_case_return_o:Nw \c_inf_fp
    \else:
      \@@_case_use:nw
        {
          \@@_division_by_zero_o:NNww \c_inf_fp ^
            \s_@@ \@@_chk:w #1 #2 \@@_sep:
        }
    \fi:
    \s_@@ \@@_chk:w #3#4
  }
%    \end{macrocode}
% \end{macro}
%
% \begin{macro}[EXP]{\@@_pow_normal_o:ww}
%   We have in front of us $a$, and $b\neq 0$, we know that $a$ is a
%   normal number, and we wish to compute $\lvert a\rvert^{b}$.  If
%   $\lvert a\rvert=1$, we return $1$, unless $a=-1$ and $b$ is
%   \texttt{nan}.  Indeed, returning $1$ at this point would wrongly
%   raise \enquote{invalid} when the sign is considered.  If $\lvert
%   a\rvert\neq 1$, test the type of $b$:
%   \begin{itemize}
%   \item[0] Impossible, we already filtered $b=\pm 0$.
%   \item[1] Call \cs{@@_pow_npos_o:Nww}.
%   \item[2] Return $+\infty$ or $+0$ depending on the sign of $b$ and
%     whether the exponent of $a$ is positive or not.
%   \item[3] Return $b$.
%   \end{itemize}
%    \begin{macrocode}
\cs_new:Npn \@@_pow_normal_o:ww
    \s_@@ \@@_chk:w 1 #1#2#3\@@_sep: \s_@@ \@@_chk:w #4#5
  {
    \if:w 0 \@@_str_if_eq:nn { #2 #3 } { 1 {1000} {0000} {0000} {0000} }
      \if_int_compare:w #4 #1 = 32 \exp_stop_f:
        \exp_after:wN \@@_case_return_ii_o:ww
      \fi:
      \@@_case_return_o:Nww \c_one_fp
    \fi:
    \if_case:w #4 \exp_stop_f:
    \or:
      \exp_after:wN \@@_pow_npos_o:Nww
      \exp_after:wN #5
    \or:
      \if_meaning:w 2 #5 \exp_after:wN \reverse_if:N \fi:
      \if_int_compare:w #2 > \c_zero_int
        \exp_after:wN \@@_case_return_o:Nww
        \exp_after:wN \c_inf_fp
      \else:
        \exp_after:wN \@@_case_return_o:Nww
        \exp_after:wN \c_zero_fp
      \fi:
    \or:
      \@@_case_return_ii_o:ww
    \fi:
    \s_@@ \@@_chk:w 1 #1 {#2} #3 \@@_sep:
    \s_@@ \@@_chk:w #4 #5
  }
%    \end{macrocode}
% \end{macro}
%
% ^^A todo: check that we compute ln to 21 digits!
% \begin{macro}[EXP]{\@@_pow_npos_o:Nww}
%   We now know that $a\neq\pm 1$ is a normal number, and $b$ is a
%   normal number too.  We want to compute $\lvert a\rvert^{b} = (\lvert
%   x\rvert\cdot 10^{n})^{y\cdot 10^{p}} = \exp((\ln\lvert x\rvert + n
%   \ln(10))\cdot y \cdot 10^{p}) = \exp(z)$.  To compute the
%   exponential accurately, we need to know the digits of $z$ up to the
%   $16$-th position.  Since the exponential of $10^{5}$ is infinite, we
%   only need at most $21$ digits, hence the fixed point result of
%   \cs{@@_ln_o:w} is precise enough for our needs.  Start an integer
%   expression for the decimal exponent of $e^{\lvert z\rvert}$.  If $z$
%   is negative, negate that decimal exponent, and prepare to take the
%   inverse when converting from the fixed point to the floating point result.
%    \begin{macrocode}
\cs_new:Npn \@@_pow_npos_o:Nww #1 \s_@@ \@@_chk:w 1#2#3
  {
    \exp_after:wN \@@_sanitize:Nw
    \exp_after:wN 0
    \int_value:w
      \if:w #1 \if_int_compare:w #3 > \c_zero_int 0 \else: 2 \fi:
        \exp_after:wN \@@_pow_npos_aux:NNnww
        \exp_after:wN +
        \exp_after:wN \@@_fixed_to_float_o:wN
      \else:
        \exp_after:wN \@@_pow_npos_aux:NNnww
        \exp_after:wN -
        \exp_after:wN \@@_fixed_inv_to_float_o:wN
      \fi:
      {#3}
  }
%    \end{macrocode}
% \end{macro}
%
%^^A begin[todo]
% \begin{macro}[EXP]{\@@_pow_npos_aux:NNnww}
%   The first argument is the conversion function from fixed point to
%   float.  Then comes an exponent and the $4$ brace groups of $x$,
%   followed by $b$.  Compute $-\ln(x)$.
%    \begin{macrocode}
\cs_new:Npn \@@_pow_npos_aux:NNnww
    #1#2#3#4#5\@@_sep: \s_@@ \@@_chk:w 1#6#7#8\@@_sep:
  {
    #1
    \@@_int_eval:w
      \@@_ln_significand:NNNNnnnN #4#5
      \@@_pow_exponent:wnN {#3}
      \@@_fixed_mul:wwn #8 {0000}{0000} \@@_sep:
      \@@_pow_B:wwN #7\@@_sep:
      #1 #2 0 % fixed_to_float_o:wN
  }
\cs_new:Npn \@@_pow_exponent:wnN #1\@@_sep: #2
  {
    \if_int_compare:w #2 > \c_zero_int
      \exp_after:wN \@@_pow_exponent:Nwnnnnnw % n\ln(10) - (-\ln(x))
      \exp_after:wN +
    \else:
      \exp_after:wN \@@_pow_exponent:Nwnnnnnw % -(|n|\ln(10) + (-\ln(x)))
      \exp_after:wN -
    \fi:
    #2\@@_sep: #1\@@_sep:
  }
\cs_new:Npn \@@_pow_exponent:Nwnnnnnw #1#2\@@_sep: #3#4#5#6#7#8\@@_sep:
  { %^^A todo: use that in ln.
    \exp_after:wN \@@_fixed_mul_after:wwn
    \int_value:w \@@_int_eval:w \c_@@_leading_shift_int
      \exp_after:wN \@@_pack:NNNNNw
      \int_value:w \@@_int_eval:w \c_@@_middle_shift_int
        #1#2*23025 - #1 #3
        \exp_after:wN \@@_pack:NNNNNw
        \int_value:w \@@_int_eval:w \c_@@_middle_shift_int
          #1 #2*8509 - #1 #4
          \exp_after:wN \@@_pack:NNNNNw
          \int_value:w \@@_int_eval:w \c_@@_middle_shift_int
            #1 #2*2994 - #1 #5
            \exp_after:wN \@@_pack:NNNNNw
            \int_value:w \@@_int_eval:w \c_@@_middle_shift_int
              #1 #2*0456 - #1 #6
              \exp_after:wN \@@_pack:NNNNNw
              \int_value:w \@@_int_eval:w \c_@@_trailing_shift_int
                #1 #2*8401 - #1 #7
                #1 ( #2*7991 - #8 ) / 1 0000 \@@_sep: \@@_sep:
  }
\cs_new:Npn \@@_pow_B:wwN #1#2#3#4#5#6\@@_sep: #7\@@_sep:
  {
    \if_int_compare:w #7 < \c_zero_int
      \exp_after:wN \@@_pow_C_neg:w \int_value:w -
    \else:
      \if_int_compare:w #7 < 22 \exp_stop_f:
        \exp_after:wN \@@_pow_C_pos:w \int_value:w
      \else:
        \exp_after:wN \@@_pow_C_overflow:w \int_value:w
      \fi:
    \fi:
    #7 \exp_after:wN \@@_sep:
    \int_value:w \@@_int_eval:w 10 0000 + #1 \@@_int_eval_end:
    #2#3#4#5#6 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 \@@_sep: %^^A todo: how many 0?
  }
\cs_new:Npn \@@_pow_C_overflow:w #1\@@_sep: #2\@@_sep: #3
  {
    + 2 * \c_@@_max_exponent_int
    \exp_after:wN \@@_fixed_continue:wn \c_@@_one_fixed_tl
  }
\cs_new:Npn \@@_pow_C_neg:w #1 \@@_sep: 1
  {
    \exp_after:wN \exp_after:wN \exp_after:wN \@@_pow_C_pack:w
    \prg_replicate:nn {#1} {0}
  }
\cs_new:Npn \@@_pow_C_pos:w #1\@@_sep: 1
  { \@@_pow_C_pos_loop:wN #1\@@_sep: }
\cs_new:Npn \@@_pow_C_pos_loop:wN #1\@@_sep: #2
  {
    \if_meaning:w 0 #1
      \exp_after:wN \@@_pow_C_pack:w
      \exp_after:wN #2
    \else:
      \if_meaning:w 0 #2
        \exp_after:wN \@@_pow_C_pos_loop:wN \int_value:w
      \else:
        \exp_after:wN \@@_pow_C_overflow:w \int_value:w
      \fi:
      \@@_int_eval:w #1 - 1 \exp_after:wN \@@_sep:
    \fi:
  }
\cs_new:Npn \@@_pow_C_pack:w
  {
    \exp_after:wN \@@_exp_large:NwN
    \exp_after:wN 5
    \c_@@_one_fixed_tl
  }
%    \end{macrocode}
% \end{macro}
%^^A end[todo]
%
% \begin{macro}[EXP]{\@@_pow_neg:www, \@@_pow_neg_aux:wNN}
%   This function is followed by three floating point numbers: $|a|^b$,
%   $a\in[-\infty,-0]$, and $b$.  If $b$ is an even integer (case $-1$),
%   $a^b=|a|^b$.  If $b$ is an odd integer (case $0$), $a^b=-|a|^b$,
%   obtained by a call to \cs{@@_pow_neg_aux:wNN}.  Otherwise, the sign is
%   undefined.  This is invalid, unless $|a|^b$ turns out to be $+0$ or
%   \texttt{nan}, in which case we return that as $a^b$.  In particular,
%   since the underflow detection occurs before \cs{@@_pow_neg:www} is
%   called, |(-0.1)**(12345.67)| gives $+0$ rather than complaining
%   that the sign is not defined.
%    \begin{macrocode}
\cs_new:Npn \@@_pow_neg:www
    \s_@@ \@@_chk:w #1#2\@@_sep: #3\@@_sep: #4\@@_sep:
  {
    \if_case:w \@@_pow_neg_case:w #4 \@@_sep:
      \exp_after:wN \@@_pow_neg_aux:wNN
    \or:
      \if_int_compare:w \@@_int_eval:w #1 / 2 = \c_one_int
        \@@_invalid_operation_o:Nww ^ #3\@@_sep: #4\@@_sep:
        \exp:w \exp_end_continue_f:w
        \exp_after:wN \exp_after:wN
        \exp_after:wN \@@_use_none_until_s:w
      \fi:
    \fi:
    \@@_exp_after_o:w
    \s_@@ \@@_chk:w #1#2\@@_sep:
  }
\cs_new:Npn \@@_pow_neg_aux:wNN #1 \s_@@ \@@_chk:w #2#3
  {
    \exp_after:wN \@@_exp_after_o:w
    \exp_after:wN \s_@@
    \exp_after:wN \@@_chk:w
    \exp_after:wN #2
    \int_value:w \@@_int_eval:w 2 - #3 \@@_int_eval_end:
  }
%    \end{macrocode}
% ^^A todo: is this \@@_exp_after_o:w necessary?  Appropriate?
% \end{macro}
%
% \begin{macro}[rEXP]
%   {
%     \@@_pow_neg_case:w, \@@_pow_neg_case_aux:nnnnn,
%     \@@_pow_neg_case_aux:Nnnw
%   }
%   This function expects a floating point number, and determines its
%   \enquote{parity}.  It should be used after \cs{if_case:w} or in an
%   integer expression.  It gives $-1$ if the number is an even integer,
%   $0$~if the number is an odd integer, and $1$~otherwise.  Zeros and
%   $\pm\infty$ are even (because very large finite floating points are
%   even), while \texttt{nan} is a non-integer.  The sign of normal
%   numbers is irrelevant to parity.  After \cs{@@_decimate:nNnnnn} the
%   argument |#1| of \cs{@@_pow_neg_case_aux:Nnnw} is a rounding digit,
%   |0|~if and only if the number was an integer, and |#3| is the $8$
%   least significant digits of that integer.
%    \begin{macrocode}
\cs_new:Npn \@@_pow_neg_case:w \s_@@ \@@_chk:w #1#2#3\@@_sep:
  {
    \if_case:w #1 \exp_stop_f:
           -1
    \or:   \@@_pow_neg_case_aux:nnnnn #3
    \or:   -1
    \else: 1
    \fi:
    \exp_stop_f:
  }
\cs_new:Npn \@@_pow_neg_case_aux:nnnnn #1#2#3#4#5
  {
    \if_int_compare:w #1 > \c_@@_prec_int
      -1
    \else:
      \@@_decimate:nNnnnn { \c_@@_prec_int - #1 }
        \@@_pow_neg_case_aux:Nnnw
        {#2} {#3} {#4} {#5}
    \fi:
  }
\cs_new:Npn \@@_pow_neg_case_aux:Nnnw #1#2#3#4 \@@_sep:
  {
    \if_meaning:w 0 #1
      \if_int_odd:w #3 \exp_stop_f:
        0
      \else:
        -1
      \fi:
    \else:
      1
    \fi:
  }
%    \end{macrocode}
% \end{macro}
%
% \subsection{Factorial}
%
% \begin{variable}{\c_@@_fact_max_arg_int}
%   The maximum integer whose factorial fits in the exponent range is
%   $3248$, as $3249!\sim 10^{10000.8}$
%    \begin{macrocode}
\int_const:Nn \c_@@_fact_max_arg_int { 3248 }
%    \end{macrocode}
% \end{variable}
%
% \begin{macro}[EXP]{\@@_fact_o:w}
%   First detect $\pm 0$ and $+\infty$ and \texttt{nan}.  Then note that
%   factorial of anything with a negative sign (except $-0$) is
%   undefined.  Then call \cs{@@_small_int:wTF} to get an integer as the
%   argument, and start a loop.  This is not the most efficient way of
%   computing the factorial, but it works all right.  Of course we work
%   with $24$ digits instead of~$16$.  It is easy to check that
%   computing factorials with this precision is enough.
%    \begin{macrocode}
\cs_new:Npn \@@_fact_o:w #1 \s_@@ \@@_chk:w #2#3#4\@@_sep: @
  {
    \if_case:w #2 \exp_stop_f:
      \@@_case_return_o:Nw \c_one_fp
    \or:
    \or:
      \if_meaning:w 0 #3
        \exp_after:wN \@@_case_return_same_o:w
      \fi:
    \or:
      \@@_case_return_same_o:w
    \fi:
    \if_meaning:w 2 #3
      \@@_case_use:nw { \@@_invalid_operation_o:fw { fact } }
    \fi:
    \@@_fact_pos_o:w
    \s_@@ \@@_chk:w #2 #3 #4 \@@_sep:
  }
%    \end{macrocode}
% \end{macro}
%
% \begin{macro}[EXP]{\@@_fact_pos_o:w, \@@_fact_int_o:w}
%   Then check the input is an integer, and call
%   \cs{@@_facorial_int_o:n} with that \texttt{int} as an argument.  If
%   it's too big the factorial overflows.  Otherwise call
%   \cs{@@_sanitize:Nw} with a positive sign marker~|0| and an integer
%   expression that will mop up any exponent in the calculation.
%    \begin{macrocode}
\cs_new:Npn \@@_fact_pos_o:w #1\@@_sep:
  {
    \@@_small_int:wTF #1\@@_sep:
      { \@@_fact_int_o:n }
      { \@@_invalid_operation_o:fw { fact } #1\@@_sep: }
  }
\cs_new:Npn \@@_fact_int_o:n #1
  {
    \if_int_compare:w #1 > \c_@@_fact_max_arg_int
      \@@_case_return:nw
        {
          \exp_after:wN \exp_after:wN \exp_after:wN \@@_overflow:w
          \exp_after:wN \c_inf_fp
        }
    \fi:
    \exp_after:wN \@@_sanitize:Nw
    \exp_after:wN 0
    \int_value:w \@@_int_eval:w
    \@@_fact_loop_o:w #1 . 4 , { 1 } { } { } { } { } { } \@@_sep:
  }
%    \end{macrocode}
% \end{macro}
%
% \begin{macro}[EXP]{\@@_fact_loop_o:w}
%   The loop receives an integer |#1| whose factorial we want to
%   compute, which we progressively decrement, and the result so far as
%   an extended-precision number |#2| in the form
%   \meta{exponent}|,|\meta{mantissa}\cs{@@_sep:}.  The loop goes in steps of two
%   because we compute |#1*#1-1| as an integer expression (it must fit
%   since |#1| is at most $3248$), then multiply with the result so far.
%   We don't need to fill in most of the mantissa with zeros because
%   \cs{@@_ep_mul:wwwwn} first normalizes the extended precision number
%   to avoid loss of precision.  When reaching a small enough number
%   simply use a table of factorials less than $10^8$.  This limit is
%   chosen because the normalization step cannot deal with larger
%   integers.
%    \begin{macrocode}
\cs_new:Npn \@@_fact_loop_o:w #1 . #2 \@@_sep:
  {
    \if_int_compare:w #1 < 12 \exp_stop_f:
      \@@_fact_small_o:w #1
    \fi:
    \exp_after:wN \@@_ep_mul:wwwwn
    \exp_after:wN 4 \exp_after:wN ,
    \exp_after:wN { \int_value:w \@@_int_eval:w #1 * (#1 - 1) }
    { } { } { } { } { } \@@_sep:
    #2 \@@_sep:
    {
      \exp_after:wN \@@_fact_loop_o:w
      \int_value:w \@@_int_eval:w #1 - 2 .
    }
  }
\cs_new:Npn \@@_fact_small_o:w #1 \fi: #2 \@@_sep: #3 \@@_sep: #4
  {
    \fi:
    \exp_after:wN \@@_ep_mul:wwwwn
    \exp_after:wN 4 \exp_after:wN ,
    \exp_after:wN
      {
        \int_value:w
        \if_case:w #1 \exp_stop_f:
        1 \or: 1 \or: 2 \or: 6 \or: 24 \or: 120 \or: 720 \or: 5040
        \or: 40320 \or: 362880 \or: 3628800 \or: 39916800
        \fi:
      } { } { } { } { } { } \@@_sep:
    #3 \@@_sep:
    \@@_ep_to_float_o:wwN 0
  }
%    \end{macrocode}
% \end{macro}
%
%    \begin{macrocode}
%</code>
%    \end{macrocode}
%
% \end{implementation}
%
% \PrintChanges
%
% \PrintIndex
